web analytics

Father’s Right Unborn Child

SWEDEN’S LIBERAL PARTY IS PROPOSING SOME CONTROVERSIAL LEGISLATION INVOLVING THE PARENTAL RIGHTS OF MEN. IF A WOMAN CHOOSES NOT TO ABORT HER CHILD, AND THE FATHER THAT BABY ASIDE THAT HE DOES NOT REALLY WANT TO BE A FATHER, SHOULD HE BE ABLE TO BASICALLY DENY ALL OF HIS PARENTING RIGHTS AND NOT HAVE TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT THAT IS WHAT THIS PROPOSAL IS PRESENTING. MEN SHOULD HAVE AN EQUAL RIGHT TO OPT OUT OF PARENTING AND CHOOSE WHETHER OR NOT TO BECOME A PARENT. MEN ARE PROPOSED TO HAVE THE RIGHT TO DISCLAIM PATERNITY.

UNTIL THE EIGHTEENTH WEEK OF PREGNANCY, AS LONG AS IT IS POSSIBLE FOR THE WOMAN TO UNDERGO THE ABORTION PROCEDURE. BASICALLY, JUST TO SIMPLIFY, IF TWO PARTIES HAVE SEX, THE WOMAN GETS PREGNANT, SHE DECIDES SHE WANTS TO HAVE THE BABY BUT THE FATHER DID NOT WANT ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT, HE WOULD BE ABLE TO NOT ONLY NOT HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF BEING A FATHER, HE WOULD NOT HAVE THE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF BEING A FATHER. AND HE WOULD NOT GET THE PRIVILEGES EITHER. THIS IS PITCHED AS A CRAZY IDEA, AND WAY TOO LIBERAL EVEN IN.

SWEDEN. I DON’T UNDERSTAND WHY IT IS CRAZY, I THINK IS ACTUALLY FAIRLY SENSIBLE. THE WHOLE, YOU SHOULD GO GET AN ABORTION, THAT IS NOT YOUR CALL TO MAKE. THAT POINT I DON’T AGREE WITH. AND IT IS NOT SAYING THAT HE CAN FORCE HER INTO AN ABORTION, IT JUST SAYS THAT HE CAN VOTE AGAINST IT. I WOULD TAKE ALL OF THAT OUT. BUT I WOULD SAY THAT IN THE FIRST EIGHTEEN WEEKS, IF YOU ARE THE FATHER, YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO VOTE, I’M INVOLVED WITH THIS KID, OR I AM NOT.

Male Abortion Is Now Being Considered

I VOTED, WHATEVER IT WAS, PLAN B IN THE BEGINNING, OR AN ABORTION, OR WHATEVER IT IS, AND IF YOU DO THAT YOU LOSE ALL RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES. THAT IS NOT YOUR KIDS, YOU ARE DONE WITH IT. BY THINK IT’S FAIR TO SAY, I WANT TO OPT OUT OF IT AND IF YOU WANT TO HAVE IT, THAT IS ON YOU, NOT ON THE. I HAVE DEFINITELY EVOLVED ON THIS, BECAUSE I REMEMBER DEBATING A FRIEND OF MINE YEARS AGO ABOUT THIS WHOLE SITUATION. OF COURSE HE IS A GUY AND BELIEVES GUYS TO BE ABLE TO.

OPT OUT, BECAUSE IF WOMEN GET THE OUTPUT IF WOMEN GET THE ABILITY TO CHOOSE, WHY SHOULD MEN NOT GET THE ABILITY TO CHOOSE AND I KEPT FIGHTING IT BECAUSE I FELT LIKE IT WAS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF BOTH PARTIES. BUT ULTIMATELY I THINK CONSENT AND CHOICE IS IMPORTANT FOR BOTH PARTIES, AND IF THE FATHER WANTS TO MAKE THAT DECISION, I DO BELIEVE HE SHOULD BE ABLE TO MAKE THAT DECISION. ALSO, AS A WOMAN, IF I WERE IN THIS SITUATION, I WOULD CERTAINLY NOT WANT A MAN WHO WANTS NOTHING TO DO WITH MY.

CHILD BE PART OF OUR LIVES. WE HAVE THIS CULTURE IN AMERICA WHERE IT IS, ABORTION IS LIKE SOME GREAT SHAME OR SOMETHING, SO THAT IS WHY THIS WILL SEEM OUTRAGEOUS TO SOME PEOPLE. FIRST OF ALL, HE CANNOT FORCE HER, THAT WOULD BE DEEPLY PROBLEMATIC, THAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH THE SOCALLED PROLIFE POSITION, BECAUSE THEY ARE AGAINST A WOMAN CHOOSING. IT IS HER BODY. IF YOU DON’T LIKE THAT, TAKE THAT UP WITH WHOEVER YOU LIKE, BUT THE WOMAN CARRIES THE BABY IN OUR SPECIES, BUT I DON’T THINK THERE IS ANY SHAME IN ABORTION AT ALL.

NO SHAME AT ALL. IF YOU DON’T LIKE THAT, THAT’S A SAD DAY FOR YOU. IF YOU SAY I THINK WE SHOULD NOT HAVE THAT CHILD, THAT IS A PERFECTLY NORMAL THING TO SAY, AND IF YOU GUYS DON’T AGREE, WELL, ONE PERSON CAN HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT TO WITHDRAW HIMSELF FROM THAT RELATIONSHIP. HERE ARE THE CHALLENGES, AND WHY PROPOSAL LIKE THIS USUALLY DON’T PASS IN VARIOUS COUNTRIES. IT IS BECAUSE COUNTRIES DON’T WANT THE FINANCIAL BURDEN OF SUPPORTING THAT CHILD. THINK ABOUT THAT FOR A SECOND. LET’S SAY IT’S A WOMAN WHO MIGHT NOT BE WELL OFF FINANCIALLY,.

AND SHE DECIDES, WELL I WANT TO HAVE THIS BABY ANYWAY. IF A FATHER CAN OPT OUT OF THAT FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, HOW DOES SHE GET SUPPORTED A LOT OF BIRDIES WERE TO FALL ON THE STATE, WHICH IS WHY I THINK A LOT OF POLITICIANS HAVE A NEGATIVE KNEEJERK REACTIONS TO PROPOSAL LIKE THIS. YOU SAID MAYBE AMERICAN POLITICIANS ABSOLUTELY. WE TALKED ABOUT SOMETHING SIMILAR THE OTHER DAY. IT IS ONE OF THE SITUATIONS WHERE AN ATMOSPHERE HAS TO BE CREATED WHERE WE ARE NOT WORRIED ABOUT THE THINGS WE ARE WORRIED ABOUT.

I’M NOT SURE OF THE DETAILS ABOUT SWEDEN’S CARE, OR HOW MUCH THE GOVERNMENT IS INVOLVED, BUT IN SITUATIONS LIKE THIS THE REASON WE GASP IS THAT WE’RE THINKING WE’RE THINKING FROM A PRIVILEGED POINT OF VIEW. BUT IF YOU HAVE ALREADY SET UP A SITUATION IN A COUNTRY WHERE THERE IS A SYSTEM YOU PAY FOR US WITH YOUR TAXES THERE’S DAY CARE AND DROP OFF PLACES. THIS HAPPENS IN CANADA. WHERE YOU ARE NOT PAYING $500 FOR TWO DAYS A WEEK, IT IS PART OF WHAT YOU ARE PAYING.

IF THAT EXISTED IN AMERICA, I WOULD DEFINITELY HAVE A KID. AS A SINGLE MOTHER OR A SINGLE FATHER, YOU ARE NOT THINKING HOW I GOING TO PAY FOR THIS THESE THINGS CREATE AN ATMOSPHERE, SO IF YOU HAVE THIS LAW THAT ALLOWS PEOPLE TO OPT OUT, IT IS LESS OF A HOW ARE YOU GOING TO DO THIS TO THIS WOMAN IT MAKES IT EASIER. BOTH OF WHAT YOU HAVE SAID IS TRUE. IN SWEDEN THEY HAVE MUCH BETTER SUPPORT FOR PARENTS, SO SHE WILL BE IN A MUCH BETTER POSITION TO TAKE CARE OF.

THE KID, IT MAKES IT LESS OF AN ONUS ON HER. BUT AT THE SAME TIME, THAT MAKES IT MORE COST FOR THE GENERAL POPULATION, AND HENCE WHY MORE PEOPLE MIGHT GET PISSED ABOUT IT. EITHER WAY, I FEEL LIKE PEOPLE HAVE TO OWN UP TO THEIR DECISION. YES THEY HAVE TO OWN UP TO THE ORIGINAL ACT THAT LED TO THE KID IN THE FIRST PLACE, BUT THEN YOU DO HAVE A DECISION TO MAKE AT EIGHTEEN WEEKS, OR WHATEVER TIME PERIOD YOU WANT TO PUT IT AT. A WOMAN HAS A CHOICE TO MAKE, AND I THINK A MAN HAVE A.

Leave a Reply