Parents sharing joint legal custody, now referred to as joint legal decision making, must reach agreements regarding major life decisions affecting their children. Each parents rights and responsibilities in communicating about reaching agreements regarding these decisions are outlined in a court ordered parenting plan. Disagreements between parents regarding these decisions are often resolved through mediation or through the use of a third person, usually referred to as a parenting coordinator. In Arizona the law is that it is consistent with the child’s best interest, the court shall adopt a parenting plan that provides.
Both parents to share legal decision making regarding their child. New custody law encourages but does not mandate equal parenting time additionally the same section of the statute provides that the court shall not prefer a parents proposed parenting plan because of the parent or the child’s gender. It is always best if both parents can decide custody for the best interest of their children, however, if not able to do so the court will enter orders either joint or sole legal decision making at the time of trial. Presently there.
Is a greater emphasis on parental responsibility as well as parental rights. There is a presumption however that joint legal decision making is not in the child’s best interest if one of the parents has committed an act of domestic violence, abused drugs, alcohol or has been convicted of any drug offense within the last twelve months, before the petition was filed. the most compelling factors the court must consider when deciding legal decision making and parenting time in Arizona include the children’s relationship with each parent and any siblings, the children’s adjustment to each parents home, schools and the community.
Joint Legal Custody in Arizona
Each parent resides in. Another factor is the wishes of the children, but only if the child is of a suitable age and maturity to make such decisions. The mental and physical health of all individuals involved in the family and the children residing in the home, it also includes which parent is more likely to allow the children frequent, meaningful and continuing contact with the other parent. The court also weighs any domestic violence, child abuse and child neglect issues as well as any intentional misleading of the court by either parent to cause unnecessary delay, increased cost of litigation or to attempt.