Sweden’s liberal party is proposing some CONTROVERSIAL LEGISLATION INVOLVING THE PARENTAL RIGHTS OF MEN. IF A WOMAN CHOOSES NOT TO ABORT HER CHILD, AND THE FATHER THAT BABY ASIDE THAT HE DOES NOT REALLY WANT TO BE A FATHER, SHOULD HE BE ABLE TO BASICALLY DENY ALL OF HIS PARENTING.
Rights and not have to pay child support? THAT IS WHAT THIS PROPOSAL IS PRESENTING. MEN SHOULD HAVE AN EQUAL RIGHT TO OPT OUT OF PARENTING AND CHOOSE WHETHER OR NOT TO BECOME A PARENT. MEN ARE PROPOSED TO HAVE THE RIGHT TO DISCLAIM PATERNITY.
Until the eighteenth week of pregnancy, as long as it is POSSIBLE FOR THE WOMAN TO UNDERGO THE ABORTION PROCEDURE. BASICALLY, JUST TO SIMPLIFY, IF TWO PARTIES HAVE SEX, THE WOMAN GETS PREGNANT, SHE DECIDES SHE WANTS TO HAVE THE BABY BUT THE FATHER DID NOT WANT ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT, HE WOULD BE ABLE TO.
Not only not have the responsibilities of being a FATHER, HE WOULD NOT HAVE THE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF BEING A FATHER. AND HE WOULD NOT GET THE PRIVILEGES EITHER. THIS IS PITCHED AS A CRAZY IDEA, AND WAY TOO LIBERAL EVEN IN SWEDEN.
I don’t understand why it is crazy, i think is actually FAIRLY SENSIBLE. THE WHOLE, YOU SHOULD GO GET AN ABORTION, THAT IS NOT YOUR CALL TO MAKE. THAT POINT I DON’T AGREE WITH. AND IT IS NOT SAYING THAT HE CAN FORCE HER INTO AN ABORTION,.
It just says that he can vote against it. I WOULD TAKE ALL OF THAT OUT. BUT I WOULD SAY THAT IN THE FIRST EIGHTEEN WEEKS, IF YOU ARE THE FATHER, YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO VOTE, I’M INVOLVED WITH THIS KID, OR I AM NOT. I VOTED, WHATEVER IT WAS, PLAN B IN THE BEGINNING, OR AN.
Abortion, or whatever it is, and if you do that you lose all RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES. THAT IS NOT YOUR KIDS, YOU ARE DONE WITH IT. BY THINK IT’S FAIR TO SAY, I WANT TO OPT OUT OF IT AND IF YOU WANT TO HAVE IT, THAT IS ON YOU, NOT ON THE. I HAVE DEFINITELY EVOLVED ON THIS, BECAUSE I REMEMBER.
Debating a friend of mine years ago about this whole situation. OF COURSE HE IS A GUY AND BELIEVES GUYS TO BE ABLE TO OPT OUT, BECAUSE IF WOMEN GET THE OUTPUT IF WOMEN GET THE ABILITY TO CHOOSE, WHY SHOULD MEN NOT GET THE ABILITY TO CHOOSE? AND I KEPT FIGHTING IT BECAUSE I FELT LIKE IT WAS THE.
Judge Declares Male Parental Rights GONE
( music ) Men are being beaten out of their parental rights, so horribly, that it is now the law of the land, that a man cannot prevent a woman from giving up his child for adoption, even when he protests. In a recent court case, a man tried to prevent the mother of his child, from giving up the child for adoption, even though the state law said that he was needed to give consent.
A judge decided that, as a man cannot prevent a woman from murdering his unborn child without his consent, so too, his consent is not needed when a woman decides to give his child up for adoption, thereby removing the state law that the entire population agreed to make as a law. This literally means, that in this country a man has zero parental rights, anymore. This goes right along with the case where child services came to a wealthy man’s house,.
Removed his children, whom he loved and had cared for, for years, and gave them to their crack head mother, because a judge decided a woman cares more for children than a man CAN. Regardless of the man caring for the children from birth, who had all sorts of medical problems from being born to a crack addict woman, and the mother being a total addict during the time. The mother’s one moment of clarity, was enough for the judge to remove the children.
And give them to her, at her request. And, of course, declared that the wealthy man, must give her child support, which of course went IMMEDIATELY to feed her crack habit. It was a great scheme. Sober up for a week, and rob the man of his children and money. BECAUSE SHE CAN. Thank you for watching The Shakaama Live Show.